解释偏差修改敌意以促进戒烟在一个样本的高特征愤怒:一个随机试验试验
James M Zech1, Tapan A Patel1, Michael J Zvolensky2
1Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Behaviour research and therapy
|February 27, 2024
概括
针对愤怒可能会改善戒烟. 对敌意的解释偏差修改 (IBM-H) 干预减少了吸烟者的愤怒和敌意,但并没有显著增加戒烟成功率.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 行为科学 行为科学
- 成研究 研究成研究
背景情况:
- 有问题的愤怒与吸烟的负面结果有关,如依赖,大量使用和失败的戒烟尝试.
- 针对愤怒的干预措施可以提高戒烟的成功率.
研究的目的:
- 评估解释偏差修改对敌意 (IBM-H) 干预措施在促进日常吸烟者中戒烟的有效性.
- 评估IBM-H对愤怒,敌意和吸烟行为的影响.
主要方法:
- 100名每天吸烟,愤怒程度高的人被随机分配到八次计算机化IBM-H或健康和放松视频控制条件 (HRVC) 中.
- 参与者试图在治疗过程中戒烟.
- 对敌意,愤怒和吸烟的评估是在治疗前,治疗中期,治疗后以及三个月的随访期间进行的.
主要成果:
- 与HRVC相比,IBM-H在治疗后和随访时显著减少了敌对的解释偏差.
- 在治疗后,IBM-H导致敌意显著减少,并在三个月的随访后,特征愤怒显著减少.
- 虽然两组都减少了吸烟,但在IBM-H和HRVC条件之间,戒烟成功率没有显著差异.
结论:
- IBM-H有效地减少了吸烟者的敌对解释偏见,敌意和特征愤怒.
- 在这项研究中,干预措施并没有显著改善戒烟率.
- 需要进一步的研究来探索愤怒管理策略,以提高戒烟的结果.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
14.3K
相关概念视频
Randomized Experiments
6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
The Scientific Method
59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K
Blinding
2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.0K
