保守主义的关联和断的结论偏见与异常突出和默认模式网络偏见
Jun Miyata1,2, Akihiko Sasamoto1, Takahiro Ezaki3,4
1Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
|February 28, 2024
概括
这项研究将精神分裂症中的保守主义和论偏见 (JTC) 与大脑网络功能联系起来. 结果显示了JTC,错觉严重程度和默认模式网络连接之间的关联.
科学领域:
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 精神病学是一个精神病学.
- 认知科学 认知科学
背景情况:
- 保守主义偏见涉及对决策要求过多的证据,而跳跃结论 (JTC) 偏见涉及证据不足.
- JTC偏见是精神分裂症和妄想患者的特征.
- 海马-中脑-状状异常突出系统和特定的大脑网络 (突出,默认模式,前端对象) 涉及到精神分裂症,但它们与保守主义/JTC偏见的联系尚不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 为了研究保守主义和JTC偏见和精神分裂症患者的大脑系统/网络之间的关联.
- 探索决策偏见与异常突出性之间的关系以及默认模式网络 (DMN) 的功能和结构.
主要方法:
- 三十七名精神分裂症患者和33名健康对照完成了一项珠子任务,测量保守主义和JTC的决策到决策 (DTD).
- 休息状态功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 数据使用独立组件分析 (ICA) 进行分析,以评估网络连接.
- 还使用ICA分析了结构和扩散MRI数据,以检查灰色和白质与DTD的关联.
主要成果:
- 发现了DTD的显著主要效应,显示了条纹体和DMN之间的功能连接.
- 这种联系与妄想严重程度有负相关性,表明较大的反相关性对应于较强的JTC和妄想.
- DTD的主要影响是在类似于DMN的灰质网络和连接功能和灰质网络的白质网络中观察到的.
结论:
- 这项研究确立了保守主义和JTC偏见以及异常突出和默认模式大脑网络之间的新关联.
- 研究结果表明,精神分裂症中的这些偏见与涉及信息处理和突出归因的特定神经系统的干扰有关.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K


