关于新型执行功能测试生态有效性的研究中的陷:系统审查和呼吁采取行动
Yana Suchy1, Michelle Gereau Mora1, Libby A DesRuisseaux1
1Department of Psychology, University of Utah.
Psychological assessment
|February 29, 2024
概括
许多声称对执行功能 (EF) 测试的生态有效性 (EV) 的研究缺乏科学严谨性. 大多数依赖于微弱的证据,未能证明对现实世界运作的实际预测.
科学领域:
- 神经心理学和认知科学 神经心理学和认知科学
- 评估和测量的评估和测量
背景情况:
- 生态有效性 (EV) 传统上意味着测试成绩预测现实世界的运作.
- 执行职能 (EF) 的面对验证测试通常在没有足够的证据的情况下被认为具有EV.
- 本审查评估了支持新型EF测试EV声明的证据质量.
结论:
- 大多数声称用于新型面部有效EF测试的EV的研究都表现出显著的概念,方法和统计缺陷.
- 对于评估神经心理测试的生态有效性而言,有必要提高科学严谨性.
- 作者,审稿人和编辑必须维护更高的标准验证研究在这个领域.
相关概念视频
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K


