在合规性和个性之间:捷克斯洛伐克心理学家在规范化期间 (1968-1989)
Radovan Šikl1, Marek Preiss2, Simona Hoskovcová3
1Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences.
History of psychology
|February 29, 2024
概括
前捷克斯洛伐克的心理学在共产主义统治下面临挑战,心理学家以三种方式适应:对齐,反对或被动服从. 积极主动的个人阻止了更的下降.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 科学的历史科学的历史.
背景情况:
- 前捷克斯洛伐克的共产主义政权 (1968-1989) 限制了科学发展,包括心理学.
- 对西方心理学和国家对人类活动的控制的有限访问阻碍了该领域的进步.
研究的目的:
- 检查在正常化时期前捷克斯洛伐克的心理学发展.
- 分析共产主义政权下心理学家所面临的挑战.
- 为了确定心理学家对政治要求的适应模式.
主要方法:
- 在规范化时代对心理学进行历史分析.
- 心理学家根据他们适应政权的策略进行分类.
- 考察政治约束对心理学研究和教育的影响.
主要成果:
- 心理学家出现了三个不同的群体:支持政权,反对政权和非政治主义者.
- 支持政权的心理学家获得了领导角色,而反对派则面临职业限制.
- 最大的群体,非政治,被动地遵守,但积极的成员防止了更严重的下降.
结论:
- 正常化时期对捷克斯洛伐克人的心理产生了重大影响,迫使他们做出艰难的妥协.
- 适应策略各不相同,影响了个人的职业生涯和该领域的发展轨迹.
- 一些心理学家的性在减轻政权的负面影响方面至关重要.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Conformity
45.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.1K
Humanistic Psychology
1.1K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
This approach...
1.1K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K


