海鲜消费的风险益处评估方法:从证据扫描中吸取的教训
Sofia M Santillana Farakos1, Jacqueline Heilman1, Eileen Abt1
1Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, United States.
Frontiers in nutrition
|March 1, 2024
概括
海鲜的风险效益评估 (RBA) 缺乏系统的方法. 优先考虑风险和益处对于为公共卫生决策和食品安全的饮食指导提供信息至关重要.
科学领域:
- 食品安全 食品安全
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 风险评估 风险评估 风险评估
背景情况:
- 定性和定量风险效益评估 (RBA) 对食品安全的公共卫生决策至关重要.
- 了解海鲜中RBA的现状对于美国的饮食建议至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 对有关海鲜中RBA的科学状况进行证据扫描.
- 确定海产品当前RBA方法的缺口和需要改进的领域.
主要方法:
- 系统的证据扫描已发表的RBA研究评估海鲜消费.
- 为研究查制定了包含和排除标准.
- 数据提取是在2019年以来发表的相关研究中进行的.
主要成果:
- 在RBA中选择健康风险和益处往往缺乏系统的方法.
- 风险管理机构的不确定性和可变性经常没有得到解决.
- 使用单一健康指标的定量RBA在监管决策或饮食指南中的直接应用有限.
结论:
- 需要一个优先级阶段,可能使用多标准决策分析,以确定具有最大公共卫生影响的风险和益处.
- 风险评估人员和管理人员之间的合作对于确定RBA的期望至关重要.
- 改进的RBA实用程序可以更好地告知风险管理决策和推进公共卫生,指导美国FDA的监管方法.
相关概念视频
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
126
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
00:48Optimal Foraging
12.1K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
12.1K