Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

151
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
151

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Perceived Sensitivity of Sensor-Based Digital Health Data: Qualitative Interview Study.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2026
Same author

Presynaptic P/Q calcium channel deficit promotes postsynaptic excitability remodeling and neurogenesis in developing thalamic circuitry.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Stakeholder Criteria for Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer Perception Tools in Health Care: Qualitative Interview Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same author

What patients and caregivers want to know when consenting to the use of digital behavioral markers.

NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience·2025
Same author

Prevalence and Clinical Course of Suspected Acute Pericarditis Following Atrial Pulsed-Field Ablation.

Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology·2025
Same author

Integrating Social Determinants of Health into Ethical Digital Simulations.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.1K

整合多式联机感知和神经技术的伦理考虑.

Meghan E Hurley1, Anika Sonig1, John Herrington2

  • 1Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

Frontiers in human neuroscience
|March 4, 2024
PubMed
概括

在医疗保健中将人工智能 (AI) 与神经数据相结合,引发了隐私和伦理方面的担忧. 利益相关者担心数据安全,患者意识,以及被动监控技术可能带来的歧视.

关键词:
有影响力的计算.计算机感知 计算机感知数字化表型化是指数字化表型化.神经数据的神经数据神经伦理学神经伦理学神经的权利神经的权利隐私 隐私 隐私 隐私 隐私 隐私

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

966
Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

43.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

966
Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

43.3K

科学领域:

  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.
  • 计算机科学 计算机科学
  • 伦理学 伦理学 伦理学

背景情况:

  • 基于人工智能 (AI) 的计算机感知技术为个性化精神病治疗提供了客观的措施.
  • 被动数据收集引发了关于隐私和自决权的伦理问题.
  • 将神经数据与人工智能集成加剧了这些道德考虑.

研究的目的:

  • 研究将计算机感知技术转化为临床护理的伦理考虑.
  • 了解利益相关者对人工智能驱动的健康监测的看法.
  • 在神经伦理学和神经权利文学中将发现置于背景中.

主要方法:

  • 与各种利益相关者进行定性访谈,包括患者,护理人员,临床医生和开发人员 (n=56).
  • 主题内容使用MAXQDA软件对采访成绩单进行分析.
  • 由国家翻译科学进步中心 (NCATS) 资助的多站点研究.

主要成果:

  • 利益相关者对数据侵入性,安全性以及披露的潜在负面影响表示担忧.
  • 伦理问题源于患者对数据收集的认识 (低意识到超意识) 的不同程度.
  • 临床医生和开发人员指出,整合神经数据放大了这些担忧.

结论:

  • 将神经技术与计算机感知相结合,引入了新的与尊严有关的伤害,包括耻辱和歧视,由于数据安全风险.
  • 患者对监测的意识,从低意识到超意识,带来了独特的伦理挑战.
  • 需要进行系统的研究,以道德地实施这些技术,尽量减少干扰,最大限度地提高患者的益处,同时减轻长期风险.