Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

129
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
129
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Cultural Safety as a Catalyst for Change: Advancing Health Equity for Indigenous Peoples in Canada.

Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society·2026
Same author

Language as a proxy for race: Language and literacy and the nursing profession.

Nursing inquiry·2023
Same author

Should the concepts chosen to guide concept-based curricula be threshold concepts?

Nurse education today·2022
Same author

Exploring integrated threshold concept knowledge as a route to understanding the epistemic nature of the evidence-based practice mindset.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing·2022
Same author

Reflective writing pedagogies in action: a qualitative systematic review.

International journal of nursing education scholarship·2021
Same author

Evaluating the impact of an arts-based multimedia knowledge translation assignment on undergraduate nursing students.

Nurse education today·2021

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.8K

阅读能力是否可以预测学生的成功? 一个范围审查审查.

Kim M Mitchell1

  • 1College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.

Nurse education today
|March 8, 2024
PubMed
概括

测试学生的阅读理解能力可以预测他们在护理课程中的成功. 早期评估更有可能预测即时的学业成绩,而不是长期的结果,如课程完成.

科学领域:

  • 护理教育 护理教育
  • 学术评估学术评估
  • 学生的成功 学生的成功

背景情况:

  • 批判性思维和分析能力对于护理实践至关重要.
  • 在护理课程中取得成功不仅需要内容理解.

研究的目的:

  • 调查阅读评估对护理学生成功的预测有效性.
  • 为护理计划的入学和进步政策提供信息.

主要方法:

  • 在护理教育中对阅读评估的文献进行范围审查.
  • 在CINAHL,ERIC和MEDLINE数据库中进行搜索 (2001年1月 - 2022年11月).
  • 使用了乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查方法.

主要成果:

  • 分析了34篇论文,检查阅读作为结果的独立预测器.
  • 在入学时进行的阅读测试更好地预测了早期的项目成功.
  • 对于远程结果 (如NCLEX-RN成功或程序完成) 的预测能力不那么明显.

结论:

  • 阅读评估是护理课程学术潜力的有价值的预测指标.
  • 调查结果对招生和进步政策有影响.
关键词:
阅读 阅读 阅读 阅读范围审查 范围审查学生的入学学生的入学.学生的留守率 学生的留守率

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

762
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.8K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

762
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.3K
  • 未来的研究应该探索阅读干预,发育进步以及种族和种族主义的影响.