加拿大和澳大利亚大学教材的同行评审:内容分析
Roghayeh Gandomkar1, Azadeh Rooholamini1,2
1Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Journal of education and health promotion
|March 11, 2024
概括
教学材料的同行评审 (PRTM) 是一个严格的教师评估方法. 对加拿大和澳大利亚大学的分析显示,PRTM往往是总结性的,有明确的标准,但在审查员识别和后勤方面缺乏透明度.
科学领域:
- 高等教育 高等教育
- 学术评价学术评价
- 教师发展学院发展学院
背景情况:
- 教学材料的同行评审 (PRTM) 提供了一个严格的替代方案来评估学生的教学表现.
- PRTM捕捉了教学的复杂性和多维性,解决了学生反的心理测量局限性.
- 本研究调查了加拿大和澳大利亚大学教师评估系统中的当前PRTM实践.
研究的目的:
- 分析和描述加拿大和澳大利亚大学对教材同行评审 (PRTM) 的实施情况.
- 在教师评估中确定与PRTM相关的共同设计元素和实践.
- 为设计和实施有效的PRTM系统提供框架.
主要方法:
- 来自46所加拿大和澳大利亚大学的网站的定性内容分析.
- 提取的PRTM数据的整合性内容分析 (诱导和演).
- 数据编码并根据PRTM设计元素的预先确定的框架组织成类别.
主要成果:
- 关于PRTM的信息可以在21所大学的网站上找到.
- PRTM主要用于总结性评估 (11所大学).
- 大多数大学定义了审查标准 (教学哲学,活动,有效性,领导力,奖学金,专业发展),但审查员识别,准备和后勤方面的细节经常缺失.
结论:
- 确定了PRTM的主要设计元素,类别和子类别,提供了一个实际的框架.
- 这个框架可以指导在学术环境中开发和实施全面的PRTM系统.
- 提高审查员和后勤方面的透明度对于稳健的PRTM实施至关重要.
相关概念视频
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
1.7K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.7K
Review and Preview
9.0K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
9.0K
Nursing Evaluation
3.3K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.3K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
1.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.6K
Critical Thinking II
2.8K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.8K


