所有的缺席都不一样:当某人缺席时,群体气候会发生什么?
International journal of group psychotherapy
|March 13, 2024
概括
组成员的缺席会根据时间不同,对组气候产生不同的影响. 早些时候的缺席会促进参与,而晚些时候的缺席会阻碍参与,影响小组氛围.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会动力学 社会动力学
- 群体行为 群体行为
背景情况:
- 临床经验表明,小组成员的缺席会对小组动态产生负面影响.
- 关于缺席对群体气候的具体影响的经验证据有限.
- 了解缺席的时间对于团队发展至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查小组成员缺席和感知到的小组气候之间的关系.
- 为了确定早期与后期小组会议期间的缺席是否有差异性影响.
- 分析对出席会员对参与和回避的看法的影响.
主要方法:
- 检查了小组成员缺席与感知到的小组气候之间的相关性.
- 在早期和后期的小组会议中出现的缺席之间进行区分.
- 分析了参加小组成员对气候的看法.
主要成果:
- 研究人员发现,群体气候和缺席时间之间存在显著的相互作用.
- 早期的小组会议缺席与参与度增加和避免减少有关.
- 晚些时候的小组会议缺席与参与度下降和避免增加相关.
结论:
- 组成员缺席的时间显著影响了组气候.
- 早期的缺席可能会促进一个更富有成效的团体氛围,与最初的假设相反.
- 晚些时候的缺席可能会损害小组凝聚力和生产力.
更多相关视频
07:53Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
2.0K
12:22Mindfulness in Motion MIM: An Onsite Mindfulness Based Intervention MBI for Chronically High Stress Work Environments to Increase Resiliency and Work Engagement
Published on: July 1, 2015
23.5K
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Groupthink
44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Leaving Groups
7.6K
The nature of leaving groups strongly influences the outcome of a nucleophilic substitution reaction.
In general, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, a nucleophile displaces a functional group, called the leaving group, from the substrate to give a substituted product. A leaving group departs the substrate molecule through heterolytic cleavage, taking the pair of electrons with it to become a relatively stable weak base in the form of an anion or a neutral molecule.
In a...
In general, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, a nucleophile displaces a functional group, called the leaving group, from the substrate to give a substituted product. A leaving group departs the substrate molecule through heterolytic cleavage, taking the pair of electrons with it to become a relatively stable weak base in the form of an anion or a neutral molecule.
In a...
7.6K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
