双面人脸提供了成功跨群接触的视觉线索:遗传混合和联盟检测
Xt XiaoTian Wang1, Geoffrey Miller2
1Applied Psychology Division, School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China.
概括
双种族面部暗示被认为是积极的,标志着祖先的联盟和增加可信度. 这项研究表明,由于遗传混合,而不是交配动机,双种族个体被视为更有利.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 进化心理学 进化心理学
- 人类的感知 人类的感知
背景情况:
- 双种族面部暗示可以影响种族感知和社会判断.
- 现有的理论表明,与双种族特征相关的潜在威胁或竞争.
- 一个进化观点提出双种族线索信号祖先的跨群联盟.
研究的目的:
- 为了测试双种族面部暗示的联盟信号假设.
- 调查双种族特征如何影响人们对吸引力,可信度和能力的看法.
- 在对双种族个体的社会认知中区分联盟和交配动机.
主要方法:
- 在美国和中国进行了两项研究.
- 参与者评估了亚洲和高加索血统的不同形态的面部图像.
- 评估包括感知到的种族,吸引力,可信度,健康,智力和职业前景.
主要成果:
- 美国和中国的样本都显示了种族认知中的种族偏见.
- 在社会判断中出现了一种一致的双种族偏爱模式.
- 社会判断是独立于种族认知,参与者性别或图像性别,支持联盟动机.
结论:
- 双种族面部特征标志着成功的遗传混合和过去的群体间联盟.
- 这些线索增强了双种族个体的可信度和合作潜力.
- 这些发现支持一种进化,联盟信号假设,而不是交配动机.
相关概念视频
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Surveys
14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K


