媒体素养干预可以改善假新闻可信度评估吗? 一个元分析
Chang Lu1,2, Bo Hu1, Meng-Meng Bao3
1School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking
|March 14, 2024
概括
媒体素养干预显著提高了评估假新闻可信度的能力. 游戏干预措施被证明是最有效的,突出了它们在打击错误信息方面的潜力.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 媒体研究 媒体研究
- 教育教育教育教育教育教育.
背景情况:
- 假新闻对决策,政治进程和社会趋势产生负面影响.
- 有效地评估假新闻对于减轻其有害影响至关重要.
- 以前对虚假新闻评估的媒体素养干预措施的研究产生了不一致的结果.
研究的目的:
- 系统地分析媒体素养干预措施在改善假新闻可信度评估方面的有效性.
- 确定影响这些干预成功的因素.
主要方法:
- 对33项独立研究进行了元分析.
- 包括来自36,256名参与者的数据.
- 对虚假新闻可信度评估的干预效应进行了统计检查.
主要成果:
- 媒体素养干预显著提高了假新闻可信度评估 (赫奇斯g = 0.53).
- 在不同的干预类型中,游戏干预表明了最高的有效性.
- 干预道,测量和参与者特征并没有显著影响结果.
结论:
- 媒体素养干预措施有效地提高了个人识别假新闻的能力.
- 基于游戏的方法在提高假新闻评估技能方面特别有前途.
- 这些干预措施的积极影响在各种环境和参与者人口统计学中是强大的.
相关概念视频
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
False Memories
88
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
88
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
49.9K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.9K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K


