实验室动物兽医对机构透明度的看法
Michael W Brunt1, Daniel M Weary1
1Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Food and Land Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada, V6T 1Z6.
Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)
|March 15, 2024
概括
实验室动物兽医对动物研究的透明度有不同的看法,机构文化和行政障碍影响信息共享. 一个合作计划可以提高科学研究中动物的开放性.
科学领域:
- 兽医医学 兽医医学 兽医医学
- 动物研究伦理 动物研究伦理
- 科学透明度 科学透明度
背景情况:
- 兽医是动物研究计划的关键,管理护理和合规.
- 他们的角色是研究和管理之间的接口,影响政策.
- 公众对兽医的信任很高,但他们对透明度的看法未得到充分研究.
研究的目的:
- 分析实验动物兽医对机构透明度的看法.
- 了解兽医如何看待在科学研究中分享有关动物的信息.
主要方法:
- 进行了半结构化,开放式的采访.
- 来自不同大学的16名主治兽医参加了会议.
- 分析了采访数据,以确定关键主题.
主要成果:
- 三个主题出现了:对透明度,文化和自我的反思.
- 兽医的个人优先事项和机构障碍有时导致不采取行动.
- 他们确定了信息共享的四种概念:真实,战略,议程驱动和可怕的不透明.
结论:
- 透明度往往不是这些兽医的机构优先事项.
- 障碍包括机构文化和行政抵抗.
- 建议制定一个多大学的行动计划,以提高动物研究的透明度.
更多相关视频
07:59Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
Published on: August 21, 2021
5.4K
08:01Using Clicker Training and Social Observation to Teach Rats to Voluntarily Change Cages
Published on: October 25, 2018
10.2K
相关概念视频
01:56Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
01:08Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K