刺激歧视中的订单效应挑战了比较判断的既定模型:对B型效应的元分析性审查
Ruben Ellinghaus1, Karin M Bausenhart2, Dilara Koc3
1Department of General Psychology: Judgment, Decision Making, Action, Faculty of Psychology, University of Hagen (FernUniversität in Hagen), Hagen, Germany. ruben.ellinghaus@fernuni-hagen.de.
Psychonomic bulletin & review
|March 20, 2024
概括
类型B效应显示了基于刺激的歧视敏感性变化,以判断任务的顺序排序. 这挑战了现有的心理物理模型,表明主观差异取决于时间顺序,而不仅仅是物理属性.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 心理物理学的精神物理.
- 认知科学 认知科学
背景情况:
- B型效应 (TBE) 描述了刺激顺序如何影响比较判断任务中的歧视敏感性.
- 著名的心理物理模型,如信号检测理论,努力解释TBE.
- TBE表明主观刺激差异受时间顺序的影响,挑战传统模型.
研究的目的:
- 提供B型效应的全面审查和元分析.
- 通过各种刺激属性和实验范式来研究TBE.
- 确定和评估解释TBE起源的候选理论.
主要方法:
- 关于B型效应的现有文献的元分析.
- 对比判断任务的审查,包括两种替代的强制选择 (2AFC) 范式.
- 对TBE的四类理论解释的识别和分类.
主要成果:
- 实质性证据支持TBE作为连续歧视实验的一般特征.
- TBE证明主观差异取决于刺激的呈现顺序.
- 确定了TBE的四个主要理论类别:差异加权,内部参考形成,贝叶斯更新和偏差值估计.
结论:
- B型效应在歧视任务中是一个强大的现象,它挑战了当前的心理物理差异模型.
- 了解积极和消极TBEs的边界条件对于未来的研究至关重要.
- 研究候选理论可以进一步阐明TBE背后的机制.
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K


