在测量错误的情况下,有效的归算方法
Anoop Kumar1, Shashi Bhushan2, Shivam Shukla3
1Department of Statistics, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, 123031, India.
Heliyon
|March 21, 2024
概括
这项研究引入了对因测量误差 (ME) 影响的缺失数据的新计算方法. 这些新技术比统计分析中的现有方法提供了更好的准确性.
科学领域:
- 统计 统计 统计 统计
- 数据科学数据科学数据科学
- 调查方法 调查方法
背景情况:
- 缺少数据是统计分析中的一个常见挑战.
- 测量错误 (ME) 进一步复杂化了缺失观测的处理.
- 现有的归算方法可能无法充分处理ME的数据.
研究的目的:
- 开发高效的差异和比率归算方法,以处理有测量错误的缺失观测.
- 分析这些新的归算技术的性能.
- 将拟议的方法与现有的归算策略进行比较.
主要方法:
- 开发新的差异和比率归算技术.
- 泰勒数列扩展的应用,用于近似平均平方误差.
- 使用最先进的归算方法进行比较分析.
- 使用真实和模拟数据集进行实证评估.
主要成果:
- 拟议的归算方法证明了在处理ME中缺少数据时的效率.
- 使用泰勒数列扩展的理论分析为性能提供了洞察力.
- 经验研究证实了开发的归算的实际实用性和改进的准确性.
- 对比表明优势比现有的归算技术.
结论:
- 开发的归算方法对于缺失值和测量错误的数据集是有效的.
- 这些方法在实际应用中为统计分析提供了宝贵的改进.
- 该研究为采样从业人员提供了使用这些先进的归算技术的指导.
相关概念视频
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Random and Systematic Errors
10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
73.7K
Statistical Analysis: Overview
6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
1.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.6K
Contaminants and Errors
89
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
89


