分析集体定向和流程反与相互依赖的工作团队中的协调和绩效相关的分析
Vera Hagemann1, Michèle Rieth1, Kai N Klasmeier2
1Faculty of Business Studies and Economics, Business Psychology & Human Resource Management, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
PloS one
|March 21, 2024
概括
有效的团队合作依赖于集体导向,这改善了协调和绩效. 反干预可以促进集体导向,特别是当它是.
科学领域:
- 团队合作和组织心理学
- 人与计算机的交互
- 认知科学 认知科学
背景情况:
- 有效的团队合作对于组织和社会成功至关重要.
- 反干预是提高团队流程和绩效的常见工具.
- 不同类型的反 (个人与团队层面,绩效与过程) 的有效性以及它们与团队成员态度 (如集体导向) 的相互作用仍然不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 调查集体导向对团队协调和绩效的影响.
- 检查不同的反干预如何影响团队表现和集体方向.
- 了解反类型和团队成员的集体方向之间的相互作用,以促进团队合作.
主要方法:
- 实验室实验与142个两个成员的团队.
- 团队在一个微观世界的模拟中协作了四个森林火灾灭绝场景.
- 贝叶斯的多层次模型被用来分析多层次的调解和随时间的变化.
主要成果:
- 集体导向与团队表现正相关,由团队协调调解.
- 与个人级别的反相比,团队级别的流程和绩效反在与任务难度增加相比保持绩效方面具有轻微的优势.
- 当初水平较低时,反干预增加了集体导向.
结论:
- 集体导向是提高相互依赖团队中的团队协调和绩效的关键因素.
- 团队层面的反似乎比个人层面的反更有效,以保持持续的表现.
- 可以利用反干预来培养集体导向,从而改善团队合作.
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Groupthink
44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
2.1K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.1K
Rotter's Locus of Control
286
Julian Rotter introduced the concept of locus of control, a cognitive factor that significantly influences personality development and learning. Locus of control refers to an individual's beliefs about the extent of control they have over events in their lives. According to Rotter, this belief system can be categorized into two types: internal and external locus of control.
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
286


