干预特征措施的可靠性和有效性用于评估基于证据的实践使用障碍
Salene M W Jones1, Bryan J Weiner1
1Divsion of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA, University of Washington, School of Public Health, Department of Global Health, Seattle, WA.
在实施基于证据的实践 (EBP) 之前评估干预特征对于成功至关重要. 这项研究验证了这些特征的措施,发现它们可靠且有用,用于预测EBP采用.
科学领域:
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
- 实施科学 实施科学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
背景情况:
- 成功实施基于证据的实践 (EBP) 需要了解潜在的障碍.
- 评估干预特征是预测和促进EBP采用的关键策略.
研究的目的:
- 评估评估干预特征的措施的可靠性和有效性.
- 确定这些措施是否可以预测使用基于证据的实践.
主要方法:
- 为175名医护人员制定和管理了109项干预特征措施.
- 通过使用Cronbach的alpha评估可靠性,并通过将得分与EBP使用相关联来评估有效性.
- 通过两个分隔一个月的调查收集数据.
主要成果:
- 所有的测量都显示出良好的可靠性 (克朗巴赫的α>0.7).
- 经常使用EBP的用户在两次调查中都报告了更有利的干预特征.
- 支持有效性,尽管建议进行进一步的测试.
结论:
- 经过验证的措施是评估EBP实施决定因素的可靠工具.
- 这些措施可以帮助预测和计划成功采用EBP.
- 进一步的研究应该完善心理测量属性,并开发更短的测量形式.
更多相关视频
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
相关概念视频
Reliability and Validity
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
