相对准确的暗示和先前的知识有助于在人类定向中偏好近距离和远距离地标
1Department of Psychology, University of Alberta; Vanderbilt University, 415 Wilson Hall, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Cognition
|March 23, 2024
概括
这项研究揭示了我们的先验知识,而不仅仅是提示精度,影响我们是否使用近 (近距离) 或远 (远距离) 标志来定位. 指令甚至可以改变这种偏好.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 空间导航 空间导航
背景情况:
- 一个占主导地位的理论表明,在空间定向方面,远距离地标优先于近距离地标.
- 然而,支持这一说法的机制和经验证据,特别是关于暗示精度和先前知识的机制和经验证据,仍然未得到充分探索.
研究的目的:
- 研究相对暗示精度和先前知识在人类空间定向中偏好近距离与远距离地标的决定中的作用.
- 测试远距离地标优势的主张,并探索潜在的认知机制.
主要方法:
- 参与者在一个沉浸式的虚拟环境中导航,学习相对于近距离和远距离地标的对象位置.
- 迷失方向后,参与者在冲突或一致的地标线索条件下指示物体位置,使用操纵的线索精度和明确/隐含的位置知识.
主要成果:
- 远距离地标的优势甚至在暗示精度偏好近距离地标时也被观察到,这表明先前知识的影响.
- 显式学习对象位置 (实验2) 导致近距离地标主导地位,与仅基于提示精度的预测相矛盾,表明受指令影响的先前知识.
结论:
- 人类空间定向暗示选择由相对暗示精度和先前知识的组合来管理,与贝叶斯推理模型保持一致.
- 预先的知识是里程碑提示选择的关键因素,可以通过上下文信息和明确的指示来动态地受到影响.
相关概念视频
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
644
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
644
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K


