使用个人参与者数据元分析估计个性化治疗效应
Florie Bouvier1, Anna Chaimani2,3, Etienne Peyrot2
1Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, France. florie.brion-bouvier@u-paris.fr.
BMC medical research methodology
|March 26, 2024
概括
估计个性化治疗效应 (ITE) 对个性化医学至关重要. 将个人参与者数据元分析 (IPD-MA) 与S学习者策略相结合,可以为各种结果提供更好的ITE估计.
科学领域:
- 生物统计学 生物统计学
- 个性化医疗是个性化的医疗.
- 流行病学 流行病学
背景情况:
- 识别受益于特定干预措施的个体是个性化医学的关键.
- 估计个性化治疗效应 (ITE) 往往需要大量数据集,因为单个试验不足.
- 个人参与者数据元分析 (IPD-MA) 提供了可靠ITE估计的解决方案,但将它们与预测模型相结合还未得到充分探索.
研究的目的:
- 在个人参与者数据元分析 (IPD-MA) 中,比较不同的单阶段建模方法来估计个性化治疗效果 (ITE).
- 评估各种策略和风险预测模型的性能,以使用模拟和真实世界的数据进行ITE估计.
主要方法:
- 使用S学习者和T学习者策略,比较了五个单阶段模型 (天真,随机拦截,分层拦截,排名-1,完全分层).
- 一个蒙特卡洛模拟研究评估模型性能与二进制和时间到事件的结果在各种场景下.
- 在模拟数据和INDANA IPD-MA数据集上使用c-statistic对效益,预测校准和平均平方误差来评估性能.
主要成果:
- 在模拟中,S-learner策略在对二进制和时间到事件结果的ITE估计方面表现出卓越的表现.
- 没有一个特定的风险预测模型始终显示出比其他模型更好的结果.
- 对于具有二进制结果的INDANA数据集,天真和随机拦截模型表现出最佳性能.
结论:
- 建议采用S-learner策略,包括治疗相互作用,以改善ITE估计.
- 在这种IPD-MA背景下,没有一种特定的风险预测方法在其他方法上表现出显著的优势.
相关概念视频
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
39
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
39
Blind Procedures
10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
126
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
Randomized Experiments
6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K


