Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

27.7K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.7K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.6K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.6K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

A Retrospective Analysis of Cardiac Anatomy in Patients Undergoing the Fontan Operation.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Counting papers or counting patients? Reframing surgical excellence in low-and middle-income countries.

Cardiology in the young·2026
Same author

Does preservation of antegrade pulmonary blood flow reduce pulmonary arteriovenous malformations after bidirectional Glenn? A retrospective observational study.

Cardiology in the young·2026
Same author

Adult Supracardiac Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection: An Uncommon Entity.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Procedures to implement the Supreme Court of India directives to withdraw/withhold life-sustaining medical treatment.

The Indian journal of medical research·2026
Same author

Factors Associated With Postoperative Arrhythmias in Patients Undergoing Isolated Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.

Cureus·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy
15:04

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy

Published on: May 18, 2011

13.1K

解读拒绝代码:了解文章为什么会被.

Vishal V Bhende1, Tanishq S Sharma1, Mathangi Krishnakumar2

  • 1Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Shree Krishna Hospital, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND.

Cureus
|March 27, 2024
PubMed
概括

在医学出版业中,拒绝手稿是很常见的. 作者可以通过确保原创性,严谨性,道德合规性和清晰的呈现来提高接受度,并与期刊标准保持一致.

关键词:
手稿的拒绝 拒绝 拒绝医学写作 医学写作同行评价是同行评价.出版成功 出版成功系统性审查 系统性审查

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Exploring Neural Correlates of Defensive Behaviors in Fear Learning and Extinction
04:03

Author Spotlight: Exploring Neural Correlates of Defensive Behaviors in Fear Learning and Extinction

Published on: December 15, 2023

894
Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection
05:10

Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection

Published on: August 20, 2007

6.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy
15:04

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy

Published on: May 18, 2011

13.1K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Neural Correlates of Defensive Behaviors in Fear Learning and Extinction
04:03

Author Spotlight: Exploring Neural Correlates of Defensive Behaviors in Fear Learning and Extinction

Published on: December 15, 2023

894
Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection
05:10

Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection

Published on: August 20, 2007

6.1K

科学领域:

  • 医学出版 医学出版
  • 科学沟通科学沟通
  • 研究传播研究传播.

背景情况:

  • 手稿的拒绝是医学出版的重要障碍,阻碍了研究的传播.
  • 拒绝的常见原因包括范围不匹配,缺乏新性,方法缺陷和道德问题.

研究的目的:

  • 阐明医学期刊中手稿被拒绝的常见原因.
  • 为作者提出可行的策略,以提高手稿接受率.

主要方法:

  • 这篇编辑回顾了导致手稿被拒绝的常见因素.
  • 关键拒绝标准的分析,包括范围不匹配,新性,方法和道德.

主要成果:

  • 常见的拒绝因素包括缺乏新性,方法上的缺陷,伦理问题和表现不佳.
  • 由于数据不可访问,作者不当行为或抄袭,提交的作品可能会被拒绝.
  • 伦理漏洞和语法错误显著增加了拒绝的可能性.

结论:

  • 作者应优先考虑原创性,方法严谨性,道德合规性和清晰的呈现.
  • 将手稿与期刊范围和标准保持一致,以及专业行为,至关重要.
  • 使用技术工具可以提高手稿质量并减少拒绝风险.