Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

54.1K
Overview
54.1K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

57.5K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
57.5K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

53.9K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
53.9K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

226.6K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
226.6K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Protocols and Pathways in Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Respiratory care·2025
Same author

Reducing Knowledge Gaps for Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation.

Respiratory care·2025
Same author

AARC and PALISI Clinical Practice Guideline: Pediatric Critical Asthma.

Respiratory care·2025
Same author

Characteristics and Outcomes of Children Hospitalized With COVID-19 During Early Pandemic and Delta Variant.

Respiratory care·2025
Same author

Role of the Respiratory Therapist in Asthma Education.

Respiratory care·2025
Same author

2022 Year in Review: Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation.

Respiratory care·2025
Same journal

Inspiratory Effort Assessment Using the Occlusion Pressure-Derived Tension-Time Index.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Clinical Usage of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Across Disease Categories and Care Settings: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Devices as Analyzed in Lung Models: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Peak Expiratory Flow Data.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Overnight Oxygenation and Patient Comfort Using a New Nasal Cannula Versus Standard Cannula in Long-Term Oxygen Therapy.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Effects of Resting Posture on End-Expiratory Lung Impedance and Regional Ventilation Distribution, Assessed Using Electrical Impedance Tomography.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Carbon Dioxide During First-Intention High-Frequency Jet Ventilation: A Narrow Therapeutic Window.

Respiratory care·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K

同行评审是同行评审的过程.

L Denise Willis1

  • 1Respiratory Care Services, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas. WillisLD@archildrens.org.

Respiratory care
|March 27, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

同行评审通过提供专家的公正批评来提高手稿质量. 作者应该仔细考虑审稿人的反,以改善他们的科学工作.

关键词:
作者 作者 作者 作者 作者编辑 编辑 编辑 编辑 编辑一个手稿,一个手稿.在同行评审中进行同行评审.出版的过程 出版的过程评论员 评审员 评审员 评审员科学价值的科学价值.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Process Development for the Spray-Drying of Probiotic Bacteria and Evaluation of the Product Quality
05:45

Author Spotlight: Process Development for the Spray-Drying of Probiotic Bacteria and Evaluation of the Product Quality

Published on: April 7, 2023

3.3K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K
Author Spotlight: Process Development for the Spray-Drying of Probiotic Bacteria and Evaluation of the Product Quality
05:45

Author Spotlight: Process Development for the Spray-Drying of Probiotic Bacteria and Evaluation of the Product Quality

Published on: April 7, 2023

3.3K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.0K

科学领域:

  • 医学出版 医学出版
  • 科学沟通科学沟通

背景情况:

  • 同行评审对于验证科学稿件至关重要.
  • 它确保已发表的研究的质量,可靠性和有效性.

研究的目的:

  • 引导临床医生有效地参与同行评审过程.
  • 为作者提供应对评论员反的策略.

主要方法:

  • 本文提供了基于科学出版的既定原则的指导.
  • 它综合了评论员和作者两者的最佳实践.

主要成果:

  • 有效的同行评审需要专家,公正的批评.
  • 有建设性的反有助于作者改进手稿.

结论:

  • 临床医生应该积极和建设性地参与同行评审.
  • 作者必须仔细考虑并解决所有审查员对手稿修订的评论.