关于道德伪善的分歧是什么原因造成的? 感知到的可比性以及人们如何利用它来批评敌人和捍卫盟友
Ike Silver1, Jonathan Z Berman2
1Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, USA.
Cognition
|April 2, 2024
概括
关于虚伪的分歧往往源于被认为的可比性,而不是客观的行为. 人们选择性地判断可比性,批评对手和捍卫盟友,揭示了影响道德判断的社会动机.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 道德心理学道德心理学
- 认知科学 认知科学
背景情况:
- 虚伪指控通常被认为是有害的.
- 关于虚伪指控的有效性,经常会出现分歧.
- 在虚伪评估中感知可比性的作用未被充分探索.
研究的目的:
- 概念化和测试在评估虚伪时所感知可比性的作用.
- 调查为什么关于虚伪指控出现分歧.
- 识别影响虚伪道德判断的认知因素.
主要方法:
- 与2599名参与者进行了三项预先注册的实验.
- 这项研究考察了观察者如何根据可比性来评估虚伪.
- 分析了与社会动机相关的可比性判断.
主要成果:
- 关于道德虚伪的分歧往往植根于不同的比较判断.
- 观察者的可比性判断基于社会动机而改变,批评或捍卫.
- 在外部群体中,类似的行为被认为是虚伪的,但在内部群体中却是一致的.
结论:
- 感知到的可比性是虚伪评估中的关键认知因素.
- 社会动机影响可比性判断,导致对虚伪的偏见评估.
- 了解可比性转移对于解释社会环境中偏见的道德判断至关重要.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
704
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
相关概念视频
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.3K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
51
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
51
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
49.9K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.9K
Ethical Dilemmas II
1.0K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.0K
