Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

126
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

131
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
131
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

118
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
118
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Port Site Excision During Completion Extended Cholecystectomy for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer - A Scoping Review.

Journal of gastrointestinal cancer·2026
Same author

Rethinking the prognostic significance of bile spillage in gallbladder cancer.

World journal of gastrointestinal surgery·2025
Same author

Updating theoretical frameworks in body dysmorphic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

JAAD international·2025
Same author

Outcomes of total hip replacement in adults with septic arthritis of the native hip joint: A systematic review.

Arthroplasty (London, England)·2025
Same author

Ethical frontiers in liver transplantation.

World journal of transplantation·2024
Same author

Heart rate variability in acute pancreatitis: a narrative review.

Translational gastroenterology and hepatology·2024
Same journal

Long-term neurological consequences of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Implications for postpartum monitoring and intervention.

World journal of methodology·2026
Same journal

Comparative effectiveness of parenteral anticoagulants (fondaparinux, argatroban, bivalirudin) in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A systematic review.

World journal of methodology·2026
Same journal

Biases of large language models in diagnosing Cushing's syndrome.

World journal of methodology·2026
Same journal

Effects of spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation priming on single-leg balance control.

World journal of methodology·2026
Same journal

Why does hepatitis B remain underprioritized? A view through lived experience.

World journal of methodology·2026
Same journal

Improving diagnostic accuracy of 72-hour supervised fasting test for hypoglycemia evaluation: A quality improvement project.

World journal of methodology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

倾向性得分匹配可以取代随机对照试验吗?

Matthias Yi Quan Liau1, En Qi Toh1, Shamir Muhamed1

  • 1Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.

World journal of methodology
|April 5, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

倾向性得分匹配 (PSM) 通过提高外部有效性和解决伦理问题,增强随机对照试验 (RCT). 将PSM与RCT整合在一起,提供了一种强有力的方法,使临床研究结果更具普遍性和稳定性.

关键词:
临床实践中的临床实践伦理学 伦理学 伦理学倾向性得分匹配的匹配方法随机化是一种随机化.随机对照试验是随机对照试验.有效性 有效性是有效性的.

更多相关视频

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

科学领域:

  • 临床研究方法论 临床研究方法论
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 流行病学 流行病学

背景情况:

  • 随机对照试验 (RCT) 是黄金标准,但由于严格的纳入标准,它们面临着伦理问题和外部有效性差等局限性.
  • 现有的观察数据来源,如注册表和电子健康记录,为临床研究提供了有价值的信息.
  • 倾向性得分匹配 (PSM) 是一种统计方法,它使用观察数据来创建可比较的组,以估计治疗效果.

研究的目的:

  • 审查将倾向性得分匹配 (PSM) 与随机对照试验 (RCT) 整合的应用,优势和考虑因素.
  • 突出PSM如何完善随机化,增强外部有效性,并解释临床研究中的协议不合规.
  • 倡导PSM和RCT的协同使用,以提高临床试验结果的概括性.

主要方法:

  • 对与随机对照试验 (RCT) 结合的倾向得分匹配 (PSM) 应用的文献综述.
  • 分析PSM如何利用观测数据根据倾向分数匹配参与者,考虑年龄,性别和并发症等共变量.
  • 检查PSM被纳入RCT分析以解决基线特征失衡的案例研究.

主要成果:

  • 通过使用追溯的观察数据,PSM规避了与RCT中保留治疗相关的伦理问题.
  • 通过允许包括经常被排除在RCT之外的多种人群 (例如老年人,孕妇,儿童),PSM增强了外部有效性.
  • 在一个RCT实验 (急性脑出血中的曼尼托) 中整合PSM,通过匹配基线特征,证明了更公平的比较.

结论:

  • 在PSM与RCT的协同整合下,与单独使用这两种方法相比,可以获得更好的研究成果.
  • 通过改进随机化,增加外部有效性和管理不合规性,PSM通过改进随机化试验来完善RCT,从而获得更具概括性的结果.
  • 未来的研究应该优先考虑将PSM整合到RCT中,以提高发现在临床实践中对更广泛的患者群体的适用性.