Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Selective behavioral, computational, and neural efficiency in executive function among open-skill athletes.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2026
Same author

Age-dependent cross-level gradients of exercise-associated advantages in behavioural, latent, and neural efficiency.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2026
Same author

Editorial: Social interaction in cyberspace: online gaming, social media, and mental health.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Self-prioritization in response selection: Computational evidence for biased evidence accumulation.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Long-term exercise is associated with distinct patterns of effective connectivity in the executive control network linked to cognitive flexibility aging.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Global executive function advantages in older adults with long-term habitual exercise are associated with resting-state functional reorganization.

GeroScience·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

任务通用或特定:警觉性调节后错误调整的调整.

Na Hu1, Quanshan Long2, Lijun Wang3

  • 1School of Preschool & Special Education, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China.

Behavioural brain research
|April 6, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究揭示了警觉如何影响后错误调整. 较低的警觉性会导致更多的后错误减速,而更高的警觉性会降低准确度的提高,影响性能监测策略.

关键词:
保持警 保持警 保持警注意力网络测试 测试注意力网络认知控制 认知控制错误后的调整是错误后的调整.

更多相关视频

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
08:17

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

7.5K
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

5.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
08:17

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

7.5K
A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
07:19

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance

Published on: March 19, 2020

5.9K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.
  • 人类表现的人类表现.

背景情况:

  • 警与执行控制功能有关.
  • 警觉对错误后调整组件的具体影响仍然不清楚.

研究的目的:

  • 调查警觉性和错误后调整之间的相关性.
  • 探索警觉如何影响后错误减速 (PES) 和后错误精度改进 (PIA).

主要方法:

  • 使用了注意力网络测试和四个选择的侧面任务.
  • 使用了三个响应刺激间隔 (RSI):200 ms,700 ms和1200 ms.
  • 应用线性混合效应建模来分析警觉性和RSI对错误后处理的影响.

主要成果:

  • 在200ms RSI时,发现警觉性和PES之间存在显著的负相关性.
  • 警觉性与PIA在700毫秒和1200毫秒的RSIs负相关.
  • 较低的警觉性与较大的早期PES相关;较高的警觉性与较小的后期PIA相关.

结论:

  • 警觉性对错误后调整的各个组成部分有不同的影响.
  • 具有不同警觉程度的个人在绩效监测中采用不同的控制策略.
  • 警觉性普遍提高了错误后的响应速度,但没有改善错误后的适应能力.