考虑默认招生降低了G7国家接种疫苗的意图和公众支持
Sanchayan Banerjee1,2, Peter John3, Brendan Nyhan4
1Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
PNAS nexus
|April 8, 2024
概括
鼓励公民反思行为冲动,如COVID-19疫苗政策,可能会反. 这种反思可能会减少意图和政策支持,这与政策制定者的预期相反.
科学领域:
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 公共政策 公共政策
- 卫生传播健康传播
背景情况:
- 政策制定者平衡政策透明度与有效性,特别是在未披露的行为推动方面.
- 行为推动力旨在影响公众行为,但其透明度仍然是一个挑战.
- 鼓励公民对推动的反思可以使观点与行为保持一致.
研究的目的:
- 检查反思对假设的默认推动政策对COVID-19提升预约的影响.
- 评估鼓励对推动的反思如何影响行为意图和政策批准.
- 了解反思,推动反击和政策支持之间的关系.
主要方法:
- 在G7国家的24303名受访者进行了在线调查实验.
- 评估了反思对自动招生 (默认推动) 和对照条件的影响.
- 测量了参与者接受COVID-19助推剂和政策批准意向的变化.
主要成果:
- 与对照组相比,被要求反思自动招生的参与者报告说,他们获得助推剂的意图较低.
- 对现状 (基线) 政策的反思也减少了助推器的意图.
- 对自动招生的反思减少了政策批准,并进一步减少了接种疫苗的意图.
- 干预措施没有显著影响整体政策批准.
结论:
- 鼓励对行为推动的反思可能会导致意外的反击和政策支持的减少.
- 通过反思的透明度可能并不总是使行为与政策目标保持一致.
- 决策者在设计涉及公民反思的推动策略时,应该考虑潜在的负面后果.
更多相关视频
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
14.3K
13:47Opsono-Adherence Assay to Evaluate Functional Antibodies in Vaccine Development Against Bacillus anthracis and Other Encapsulated Pathogens
Published on: May 19, 2020
3.4K
相关概念视频
Vaccinations
44.4K
Overview
44.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
254
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
254
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
169
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
169
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
