一个基于心形{Te2Nb19O60}集群的3D异极聚氧基基基框架,具有质子导电性属性
Ping-Xin Wu1, Yue Han1, Yu-Jin Lin1
1Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Inorganic Oxygenated-Materials, College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China. sunyq@fzu.edu.cn.
Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)
|April 9, 2024
概括
研究人员使用{Te2Nb19O60}集群和铜复合体开发了一种新的3D替代异极聚酸框架. 这种新材料证明了对潜在应用的前景良好的质子导电性和稳定性.
科学领域:
- 无机化学 无机化学
- 材料科学 材料科学 材料科学
- 固态化学 固态化学
背景情况:
- 异极聚氧酸盐 (HPONb) 是多功能无机集群,具有可调节的结构和特性.
- 开发具有增强稳定性和功能的新型HPONb框架对于高级应用程序至关重要.
- 替代HPONb材料的探索较少,这为新发现提供了机会.
研究的目的:
- 为了合成和描述一种新的3D替代异极聚氧酸盐框架.
- 调查结构特征,包括独特的{Te2Nb19O60}集群及其组装成3D架构.
- 为了评估合成材料的化学稳定性和质子导电性.
主要方法:
- 单晶X射线衍射用于结构确定.
- 用于成分验证的元素分析和光谱技术.
- 电化学阻抗光谱测量质子导电性.
主要成果:
- 一个新的3D异极聚氧酸框架,H5K3Na[Cu(en) ]2[Cu(en) 0.75(H2O) 2.5]{[[(Te2Nb19O58)(μ3-OH) ]2}·24H2O,已成功合成.
- 该结构具有独特的19个核基酸盐集群 ({Te2Nb19O60}) 和6个连接的pcu拓,形成1D通道.
- 该材料表现出良好的化学和溶剂稳定性,其质子导电率为7.9 × 10−3 S cm−1 在85°C下 98% RH.
结论:
- 这种新型替代HPONb框架的成功合成扩大了复杂无机结构的图书馆.
- 独特的集群和框架架构有助于观察到的质子导电性.
- 该材料的稳定性和导电性表明其在质子导电膜或电化学装置中的潜在应用.
相关概念视频
Predicting Molecular Geometry
34.3K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
34.3K
Valence Bond Theory
8.5K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
8.5K
Metal-Ligand Bonds
20.7K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
20.7K
Coordination Number and Geometry
15.7K
For transition metal complexes, the coordination number determines the geometry around the central metal ion. Table 1 compares coordination numbers to molecular geometry. The most common structures of the complexes in coordination compounds are octahedral, tetrahedral, and square planar.
15.7K
Metallic Solids
18.4K
Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
18.4K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
42.4K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
42.4K


