Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

41
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
41
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

144
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
144
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?

F1000Research·2026
Same author

Supporting policy through research funding: how UK funders can use Areas of Research Interest to bridge evidence gaps.

Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice·2026
Same author

Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.

Evaluation & the health professions·2025
Same author

The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme in England: a mixed methods evaluation.

Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice·2025
Same author

Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2024
Same author

'It depends': what 86 systematic reviews tell us about what strategies to use to support the use of research in clinical practice.

Implementation science : IS·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

一个修改后的行动框架,以开发和评估学术政策参与干预措施.

Petra Mäkelä1, Annette Boaz2, Kathryn Oliver3

  • 1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Kings Cross, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. petra.makela@lshtm.ac.uk.

Implementation science : IS
|April 12, 2024
PubMed
概括

一个修改后的SPIRIT框架有助于评估各个部门的学术政策参与干预措施. 这种增强的工具通过指导参与策略的开发和评估来支持基于证据的决策.

关键词:
参与学术政策的参与.以证据为基础的政策.框架修改 框架修改

更多相关视频

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

科学领域:

  • 政策研究 政策研究
  • 知识 翻译 翻译
  • 高等教育研究 高等教育研究

背景情况:

  • 现有的框架往往未能具体指导对学术政策参与的评估.
  • 弥合证据,政策和实践之间的差距需要有针对性的评估工具.
  • 需要在卫生政策背景之外建立适应性框架.

研究的目的:

  • 修改SPIRIT (通过研究支持健康政策:干预试验) 框架.
  • 创建一个超出卫生政策范围的适用框架,涵盖社会,环境和经济影响.
  • 解决更广泛的学术政策参与的动态,以改善评估.

主要方法:

  • 涉及文献评论的代方法.
  • 与来自高等教育机构和政策专业人士的各种利益相关者进行商.
  • 在学术政策参与能力 (CAPE) 计划评估中的应用.

主要成果:

  • 修改后的SPIRIT框架包括一个新的领域:"影响和可持续性".
  • 增强的框架是有目的的,有信息的,并指导有针对性的干预.
  • 它为建立有关学术政策参与的知识提供了一个结构.

结论:

  • 修改后的SPIRIT框架对于证据政策生态系统来说是可访问和有意义的.
  • 它为开发,评估和改进学术政策参与干预提供了潜在的应用.
  • 该框架最终支持在决策决策中使用证据.