科学家如何解释和解决资助标准:创造价值和不良副作用
Conor O'Kane1, Jing A Zhang1, Jarrod Haar2
1Otago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
概括
科学家们战略性地解决资助标准,如可行性和团队凭证,以获得成功的资助. 然而,过度处理这些标准可能会产生意想不到的负面影响,阻碍价值创造.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 科学政策 科学政策
- 研究资金研究资金.
背景情况:
- 科学家与资助机构之间的互动至关重要,但人们对其了解甚少.
- 引导这种关系的社会机制需要进一步研究.
研究的目的:
- 检查科学家如何解释和解决资金标准,以最大限度地实现成功.
- 为了确定竞争性赠款申请策略的潜在不利副作用.
主要方法:
- 对科学家在授予申请的方法进行定性分析.
- 审查融资标准的解释和战略反应.
主要成果:
- 关键标准包括研究可行性,调整和团队凭证.
- 有效地解决标准可以提高融资前景和价值.
- 过度处理标准可能会产生反作用,导致"价值创造摩擦".
结论:
- 在潜在的价值创造和实际的价值创造摩擦之间存在区别.
- 了解科学家对资助标准的解释对决策者和资助机构至关重要.
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
126
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
95
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
95
Bias
4.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.2K
What is Genetic Engineering?
74.1K
Overview
74.1K


