在COVID-19大流行期间的研究伦理审查:一项国际研究
Fabio Salamanca-Buentello1, Rachel Katz2, Diego S Silva3
1Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada.
PloS one
|April 16, 2024
概括
研究伦理委员会 (ERC) 通过修改程序,适应COVID-19的挑战,尽管资金有限和外部压力. 许多人采用了新的做法,支持他们永久实施以应对未来的公共卫生紧急情况.
科学领域:
- 医学伦理 医学伦理
- 公共卫生政策 公共卫生政策
- 全球卫生治理全球卫生治理
背景情况:
- 在COVID-19大流行期间,研究伦理委员会 (ERC) 面临着前所未有的挑战.
- 在不确定性中,迅速审查与严格评估高风险研究之间的平衡至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 探索全球ERC在COVID-19大流行期间的经验和表现.
- 为了确定未来公共卫生紧急情况的挑战,适应和经验教训.
主要方法:
- 对来自48个国家的203位ERC主席或代表进行匿名,横截面,全球在线调查.
- 调查于2022年10月至2023年2月进行,包括50个项目与开放式问题.
主要成果:
- 为ERC的运作分配了有限的额外资金;许多人调整了程序,但没有评估成功.
- 大多数审查都在不到三个星期内完成,尽管一些ERC受到外部压力,但COVID-19研究是优先考虑的.
- 欧洲研究委员会之间的合作很少发生,但外部审查经常得到验证.
结论:
- 在疫情期间,ERC表现出了性和适应能力,实施了创新的程序.
- 调查结果为加强ERC在未来公共卫生紧急情况中的运作提供了洞察力.
- 国际合作和政策制定对于提高ERC在危机中的表现至关重要.
更多相关视频
09:03Nasal Brushing Sampling and Processing Using Digital High Speed Ciliary Videomicroscopy – Adaptation for the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published on: November 7, 2020
4.8K
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
3.5K
相关概念视频
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Ethics and Bioethics
1.4K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.4K
Study Designs in Epidemiology
215
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
215
Ethical Dilemmas I
885
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
885
Ethical Dilemmas II
1.0K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
254
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
254
