系统事故分析工具的应用,以调查食品安全事件
Dileyni Díaz De Oleo1, Louise Manning2, Lynn McIntyre3
1TADRUS Research Group, Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety
|April 18, 2024
概括
系统事故分析工具通过识别食品安全事件的根本原因来加强食品安全管理. 这些方法有助于设计可靠的食品安全管理系统 (FSMS),并防止反复发生的FSI.
科学领域:
- 食品安全管理 食品安全管理
- 系统安全工程系统安全工程
- 风险分析 风险分析
背景情况:
- 有效的食品安全 (FS) 管理需要了解导致食品安全事件 (FSI) 的因素.
- 当前的FS管理系统 (FSMS) 需要强大的方法来调查FSI和实施控制.
- 现有的线性和流行病学工具为复杂的社会技术食品系统提供了有限的范围.
结论:
- 系统事故分析工具为社会技术食品系统中FSI提供了更深入的理解.
- 有效的FSMS验证,验证,再验证和再验证对于防止反复发生的FSIs至关重要.
- 这些方法为新出现的食品安全问题及其控制提供了新的实践信息.
相关概念视频
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Contaminants and Errors
89
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
89
Data Validation
161
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
161
Development of Analytical Methods
416
An analytical methodology can be divided into four sequential steps: technique, method, procedure, and protocol. A technique is a scientific principle that rationalizes a specific phenomenon through chemical measurements. Adapting a technique for analyzing a sample of interest is termed a method. The procedure outlines the directions for performing the analysis via an analytical method. The protocol is the detailed guidelines on the procedure, which should be strictly followed to obtain the...
416


