相关实验视频
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

10:36
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
12.1K
一个详尽的ADDIS原则用于在线FWER控制
Lasse Fischer1, Marta Bofill Roig2, Werner Brannath1
1Competence Center for Clinical Trials Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|April 18, 2024
概括
这项研究引入了改进的在线多重测试方法,可以提高假设拒绝能力,同时保持家族错误率 (FWER) 控制. 这些新的程序均地改进了现有的适应性丢弃 (ADDIS) 方法.
科学领域:
- 统计 统计 统计 统计
- 统计学假设测试 统计学假设测试
背景情况:
- 在线多重测试解决了随着时间的推移顺序的假设评估.
- 在多次测试中,对Familywise Error Rate (FWER) 控制对于管理I型错误至关重要.
- 适应性排放 (ADDIS) 程序是FWER在线控制和电源的当前最先进的技术.
研究的目的:
- 统一提高现有的ADDIS程序的性能.
- 加强在线多重测试的力量,同时严格控制FWER.
- 在FWER控制的程序中建立假设拒绝事件的理论限制.
主要方法:
- 开发一种新的原则,以统一地改进ADDIS框架.
- 理论分析以证明与标准ADDIS相比,更高或相同的拒绝率.
- 将新原则应用于特定的ADDIS变种,如ADDIS-Spending和ADDIS-Graph.
主要成果:
- 提出的方法在所有ADDIS程序中均地提供了改进,至少拒绝了同样多的假设.
- 在某些场景中,新程序显示了对拒绝假设的更强的力量.
- 证明没有其他FWER控制程序可以实现更大的拒绝事件集.
结论:
- 引入的统一改进原则提高了FWER控制下的在线多重测试能力.
- 这些进步为在各种依赖时间的研究环境中测试顺序假设提供了更有效的工具.
- 这些发现为在线数据流的统计推理领域提供了重大进展.
相关概念视频
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
681
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
681
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
517
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
517
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
198
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
198
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
1.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.6K
Contaminants and Errors
89
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
89
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K

