相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Simultaneous Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation during Virtual Reality Exposure

Simultaneous Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation during Virtual Reality Exposure

Published on: January 18, 2021

用虚拟现实来处理侵略调节问题的治疗:随机对照试验的研究协议

Bas R van Wolffelaar¹, Joan E van Horn¹, Larissa M Hoogsteder^1,2

¹De Forensische Zorgspecialisten, de Waag, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Frontiers in psychology

|April 19, 2024

概括

这项研究将在虚拟环境 (Re-ART VR) 中的响应性侵略调节疗法与成人法医门诊患者的标准疗法进行比较. Re-ART VR可能提供一种更现实的,更有效的方法来提高侵略调节技能.

科学领域:

法医心理学法医心理学
临床心理学临床心理学
人与计算机的交互

背景情况:

违规者的侵略行为带来了重大的社会和个人风险.
传统的认知行为疗法 (CBT) 和角色扮演在现实世界的侵略管理中存在局限性.
虚拟现实 (VR) 为治疗技能建设提供了一个可控的,现实的环境.

研究的目的:

与标准治疗相比,在虚拟环境 (Re-ART VR) 中评估Re-ART的有效性.
评估VR在侵略调节治疗中克服传统角色扮演局限性的潜力.
研究VR对侵略管理的行为和认知方面的影响.

主要方法:

一个随机对照试验,比较Re-ART VR和标准Re-ART.
成年法医门诊患者与侵略调节问题参与.
干预包括3-6个月的"控制技能"",影响思维"和"处理冲突"模块.

主要成果:

主要结果:侵略性调节的程度.
二次结果:冲动性和认知偏见.
患者和治疗师的动机被认为是缓和因素.

结论:

关于VR用于法医门诊患者的侵略调节的先前研究有限.
通过虚拟现实体验学习可能有利于那些对CBT不完全响应的人.
虚拟现实独特的能力显示出增强侵略调节治疗结果的潜力.

关键词:

在 Re-ART 中进行 Re-ART.这就是为什么VVR是VVR.攻击性侵略性攻击性法医门诊患者法医门诊患者法医精神病学法医精神病学随机对照试验是随机对照试验.响应性攻击调节疗法是响应性攻击调节疗法.虚拟现实虚拟现实虚拟现实虚拟现实

更多相关视频

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults

Published on: February 12, 2020

Behavioral Training Procedures for Head-fixed Virtual Reality in Mice

Behavioral Training Procedures for Head-fixed Virtual Reality in Mice

Published on: September 6, 2024

相关概念视频

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.