制定一个务实的共识程序,以支持ICH S1B(R1) 证据重量的致癌性评估
Arianna Bassan1, Ronald Steigerwalt2, Douglas Keller3
1Innovatune srl, Padova, Italy.
Frontiers in toxicology
|April 22, 2024
概括
修订后的ICH S1B指南使用证据权重 (WoE) 方法来评估致癌性. 该框架标准化了证据整合,以便在监管提交时进行一致,透明的决策.
科学领域:
- 药理学和毒理学 药理学和毒理学
- 监管科学 监管科学
背景情况:
- 国际协调理事会 (ICH) S1B关于致癌性测试的指南已通过附录更新.
- 本附录介绍了一种综合综合的证据权重 (WoE) 方法,以确定是否需要对大鼠进行为期2年的致癌性研究.
研究的目的:
- 根据ICH S1B(R1) WoE标准,标准化整合证据的程序框架.
- 在致癌性危险评估中促进透明,一致和记录的决策.
- 讨论研究组织和数据提交监管审查的最佳实践.
主要方法:
- 制定用于致癌性危险评估的务实共识程序.
- 整合了来自六个关键的WoE因素的证据,这些因素在ICH S1B (R1) 附录中描述.
- 考虑主要证据来源,机制分析,替代方法,代谢物和数据可靠性.
主要成果:
- 已经提出了一个标准化的框架,用于整合来自六个WoE因素的证据.
- 该框架强调使用对安全信号的协同分析进行整体评估.
- 提出了一个汇总证据交叉整合的报告格式.
结论:
- 证据权重 (WoE) 方法为分析安全信号提供了一个协同作用的证据网络.
- 标准化程序提高了对致癌性风险因素和人类风险水平的理解.
- 即使需要对大鼠进行为期2年的研究,WoE评估也提供了超越传统生物测试的宝贵见解.
相关概念视频
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
1.3K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.3K
Hazard Ratio
116
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
116
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
126
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
282
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
282


