评估弗林特社区道德审查委员会 (CBOP-CERB) 的影响和有效性:试点研究
概括
密歇根州弗林特的一个社区伦理审查委员会 (CERB) 评估了其对获得资金和改善服务的影响. 该研究为其他社区咨询委员会展示价值并实现目标提供了一个模型.
科学领域:
- 基于社区的参与式研究.
- 卫生公平性健康公平性
- 项目评价 项目评价
背景情况:
- 社区咨询委员会 (CAB) 对研究和质量改进至关重要.
- 位于密歇根州弗林特的社区伦理审查委员会 (CERB) - 社区组织合作伙伴 (CBOP) 试图评估其影响.
- 确保资金和证明价值是CAB面临的关键挑战.
研究的目的:
- 评估CBOP-CERB的影响和有效性.
- 为其他CAB建立和扩大其影响力的框架.
- 为了证明CAB对于未来的资金和目标实现的价值.
主要方法:
- 聘请一名学术研究员和一个社区合作伙伴来设计和实施评估.
- 对CBOP-CERB进行了两个不同的评估.
- 收集了研究人员和弗林特地区社区居民的观点.
主要成果:
- 评估从多个利益相关方的角度提供了关于CBOP-CERB影响的见解.
- 确定了建立和扩大CAB的影响力的战略.
- 证明了CAB在阐述,评估和实现其目标方面的价值.
结论:
- 评估过程确定了CBOP-CERB的价值和影响.
- 这些发现为寻求提高其有效性和资金的其他CAB提供了可转移的模型.
- 有效的评估对于社区研究倡议的可持续性和增长至关重要.
相关概念视频
01:56Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
01:52Persuasion Strategies
38.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K