Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

94
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
94
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

198
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
198
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

[Analysis of composite traditional Chinese medicine constitution: an investigation of 974 volunteers].

Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine·2012
Same author

XM: association testing on the X-chromosome in case-control samples with related individuals.

Genetic epidemiology·2012
Same author

[New progress of study on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes].

Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi·2012
Same author

A study on voiding pattern of newborns with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

Urology·2012
Same author

Effects of 1,1,1-trichloroethane on enzymatic activity and bacterial community in anaerobic microcosm form sequencing batch reactors.

Ecotoxicology (London, England)·2012
Same author

Effect of silicon and sodium on thermoelectric properties of thallium-doped lead telluride-based materials.

Nano letters·2012

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

503

在元分析的进步:一个统一的建模框架与测量错误的纠正.

Betsy Jane Becker1, Qian Zhang2

  • 1Synthesis Research Group, Roswell, Georgia, USA.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
|April 26, 2024
PubMed
概括

本研究引入了多变量元分析的统一模型,包括对标准化平均差异 (d) 和相关性 (r) 的测量误差纠正,以提高心理学研究的可复制性.

科学领域:

  • 心理学 心理学 心理学
  • 统计方法 统计方法

背景情况:

  • 多变量结果在心理学研究中很常见,导致依赖性影响.
  • 多变量元分析从初级研究中估计了平均效应和方差-共变量矩阵.
  • 测量错误可能会影响元分析结果的准确性.

研究的目的:

  • 为多变量元分析提供统一的建模框架.
  • 将测量错误的纠正纳入这个框架.
  • 通过解决测量错误来提高心理学研究的可复制性.

主要方法:

  • 专注于标准化平均差异 (d) 和相关性 (r) 作为常见效应大小.
  • 使用通用的最小平方估计.
  • 概述估计的平均向量和对测量误差进行校正的方差-共方差矩阵.

主要成果:

  • 介绍了一个统一的建模框架,用于多变量元分析与测量错误的纠正.
  • 该框架为标准化平均差异和相关性提供了平均向量和方差-共方差矩阵的校正估计.
  • 该方法解决了心理研究中测量错误经常被忽视的影响.

结论:

关键词:
衰减减弱化是一种相关性 相关性 相关性一般化的最小平方.测量错误的纠正 测量错误的纠正多变量元分析.标准化的平均差异差异.

更多相关视频

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

503
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.7K
  • 在多变量元分析中,解决测量误差至关重要.
  • 拟议的框架提高了心理学研究结果的准确性和可复制性.
  • 这种统一的方法非常重要,因为在心理学研究中越来越多地使用多变量结果.