灵长类动物群体凝聚力的结构和认知机制
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK, [email: robin.dunbar@psy.ox.ac.uk].
The Behavioral and brain sciences
|April 29, 2024
概括
大型灵长类动物群体使用友网络,结合行为和认知技能来克服社会压力和分裂. 这些策略使复杂的社会结构成为可能,支持更大的群体规模和多样化的息地.
科学领域:
- 灵长类的社会行为.
- 进化人类学的进化人类学.
- 认知生态学是一种认知生态学.
背景情况:
- 群体生活提供了好处,但本质上会造成社会压力,可能导致分裂.
- 了解物种如何维持大规模,稳定的社会群体对于进化生物学至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 研究灵长类动物用来抵消大群体中社会分裂的机制.
- 探索灵长类动物群体大小,社会结构和认知能力之间的关系.
主要方法:
- 在灵长类物种中对理网络和认知数据的比较分析.
- 检查社会策略,如"朋友的朋友"效应和投资于结合行为.
- 这些策略与特定的集团规模值的相关性.
主要成果:
- 大型,稳定的灵长类动物群体利用"朋友的朋友"网络来同步活动.
- 增加对结合行为的投资,在饮食适应的支持下,缓解了社会压力.
- 先进的认知技能管理许多弱的社会关系,创造多层次的社交.
- 这些策略随着团队规模的增加而逐渐出现,克服了"玻璃天花板".
结论:
- 灵长类动物的社会进化涉及一系列适应性策略,使更大,更稳定的群体成为可能.
- 这些发现与社会大脑假设和网络理论一致,解释了信息流的优化.
相关概念视频
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Nonconscious Mimicry
4.6K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.6K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K


