用于预测急性下胃肠道出血的临床结果的评分系统的比较:一项前性队列研究
Kamales Prasitvarakul1, Nawawich Attanath2, Arunchai Chang3
1Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hatyai Hospital, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.
World journal of surgery
|April 30, 2024
概括
奥克兰和格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德得分有效预测严重的下胃肠道出血 (LGIB),输血和死亡率,优于AIMS65得分. 这些分数为LGIB患者分层提供了可比的性能.
科学领域:
- 胃肠病学 胃肠病学
- 临床结果研究研究
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
背景情况:
- 急性下胃肠道出血 (LGIB) 带来了重大的临床挑战.
- 准确预测LGIB严重程度和结果对于患者管理至关重要.
- 现有的评分系统需要验证以获得最佳的临床效用.
研究的目的:
- 评估奥克兰,格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德 (GBS) 和AIMS65评分对急性LGIB的预测性表现.
- 为了比较这些得分在预测严重LGIB,需要输血,静血干预,再出血和死亡率方面的有效性.
- 为了确定最适合的分数系统来分层LGIB患者.
主要方法:
- 从2020年7月到2021年7月,对150名急性LGIB患者进行前性队列研究.
- 计算所有注册患者的奥克兰,GBS和AIMS65分数.
- 使用接收器运行特征曲线和多变量逻辑回归来分析性能.
主要成果:
- 奥克兰和GBS得分显示了严重的LGIB,输血需求和死亡率的可比且强大的预测性能.
- 与奥克兰和GBS相比,AIMS65得分显示这些结果的表现较差.
- 这三个评分都在预测需要静血干预和住院再出血方面都不理想.
结论:
- 奥克兰分数和GBS是严重LGIB,输血和住院死亡率的优秀和可比的预测指标.
- GBS可以被视为可靠的替代评分系统,用于分层急性LGIB患者.
- 可能需要进一步的研究来改善血静干预和再出血的预测.
相关概念视频
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
184
Assessing the gastrointestinal (GI) system is a complex process that begins with collecting subjective data. This data, collected through patient interviews, provides crucial insights into the patient's health history, perception patterns, and lifestyle habits, all contributing significantly to GI health.
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
184
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
178
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
178
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
60
Esophageal varices often manifest as gastrointestinal bleeding episodes, presenting symptoms like hematemesis (vomiting of blood), hematochezia (passing fresh blood via the rectum), and melena (black, tarry stools). Other signs can include weight loss, anorexia, abdominal discomfort, jaundice, pruritus, altered mental status, and muscle cramps.
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
60


