相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia

Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia

Published on: July 2, 2013

主要语言对术后中风结果的影响

Emna Bakillah¹, Adora Moneme¹, Danielle Brown²

¹Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

American journal of surgery

|April 30, 2024

概括

语言障碍对大多数术后中风结果没有显著影响. 然而,非英语主要语言说话者需要输卵管的几率更高,可能是由于沟通挑战.

科学领域:

神经学神经学
医疗保健服务研究医疗服务研究

背景情况:

语言障碍可能会影响急性中风的结果.
这项研究调查了非英语主要语言说话者手术后中风的结果.

研究的目的:

为了比较英语和非英语主要语言使用者的术后中风结果.
识别与语言障碍有关的潜在的护理差异.

主要方法:

使用医疗保健成本和利用项目国家住院患者数据库 (2016-2019) 进行回顾性队列研究.
在密歇根州,马里兰州和新泽西州对3078名患有术后中风的成年患者进行了分析.
倾向性得分匹配和回归分析,以比较英语 (EPL) 和非英语 (n-EPL) 主语言使用者之间的结果.

主要成果:

在EPL和n-EPL患者之间没有观察到住院时间或大多数次要结果的显著差异.
非英语主要语言说话者在输卵管放置的几率明显更高 (OR 1.95).

结论:

术后中风的结果在很大程度上是可以比较的,不管说什么主要语言.
在非英语主要语言使用者中,食管放置的可能性增加表明潜在的患者-提供者沟通障碍.

关键词:

非英语的主要语言结果的结果.在手术后的中风中.

更多相关视频

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Published on: January 18, 2018

相关概念视频

Language and Cognition

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.