正式化声望偏见:具有一级和二级线索的模型之间的差异.
Seiya Nakata1, Akira Masumi2, Genta Toya3
1International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Evolutionary human sciences
|May 1, 2024
概括
声望偏见,模仿高地位的个人,影响文化演变. 这项研究模拟了两种声望的定义,显示了行为如何在人口中传播的不同影响.
科学领域:
- 社会学习是社会学习.
- 文化演变的文化演变.
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 人类的知识和行为通过社会学习传播.
- 声望偏见,模仿有声望的个人,是关键的,但缺乏正式的定义.
- 现有的定义使用一级 (外观) 或二级 (社会关注) 的线索.
研究的目的:
- 从理论上研究声望偏见对文化演变的影响.
- 制定和研究声望偏见的基本属性.
- 为了比较由两个不同的声望偏见模型产生的文化进化动态.
主要方法:
- 开发了声望偏差的计算模型.
- 纳入了两种对声望的定义:一级线索和二级线索.
- 将每个模型产生的文化进化动态进行比较.
主要成果:
- 声望偏见的两种形式化产生了不同的文化进化动态.
- 区分一级和二级的威望线索至关重要.
- 选择的声望定义显著影响行为传播和文化传播.
结论:
- 正式化声望偏见需要仔细考虑暗示类型 (第一阶段与第二阶段).
- 不同的声望偏见模型导致文化进化中的不同结果.
- 这项研究为了解声望偏见在塑造人类社会中的作用提供了基础.
相关概念视频
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K


