与什么相比是有害的? 游戏问题和模两可的因果问题
Kristoffer Magnusson1,2, Fred Johansson1,3, Andrew K Przybylski2
1Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Solna, Sweden.
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
|May 3, 2024
概括
关于视频游戏效应的研究面临挑战,原因是模糊的问题和复杂的暴露. 需要更清晰的干预措施来理解视频游戏和心理健康结果之间的因果关系.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 因果推理因果推理
背景情况:
- 对电子游戏有害影响的担忧仍然存在,但对其因果作用的理解仍然有限.
- 以前的研究往往解决了关于视频游戏暴露的模两可的因果问题.
- 视频游戏暴露的复杂性,涉及多个因素,使影响估计变得复杂.
研究的目的:
- 概述了识别电子游戏玩的因果关系的要求.
- 批判性地评估现有的关于电子游戏和心理健康的研究.
- 提出一个框架,以便对电子游戏影响进行更清晰的调查.
主要方法:
- 应用因果推理原则来分析视频游戏暴露作为复合暴露.
- 检查视频游戏研究中的曝光版本混的挑战.
- 讨论玩电子游戏和不玩电子游戏的模两可.
主要成果:
- 视频游戏暴露是多方面的,有很多变体影响结果.
- 定义视频游戏曝光的缺失与定义曝光本身一样模糊.
- 暴露-转换混在估计因果效应方面存在重大障碍.
结论:
- 将视频游戏研究转化为可行的健康干预措施需要明确的比较.
- 针对电子游戏的干预措施应与其他干预措施对类似健康结果进行评估.
- 未来的研究必须专注于视频游戏参与度及其影响的具体,可衡量的方面.
相关概念视频
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
299
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
299
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Causality in Epidemiology
397
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
397
Bias
4.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K


