感官处理措施2 (SPM2) 和感官配置文件2 (SP2) 的学校年龄版本之间的收有效性:一个试点研究
Sarah Jones1, Mong-Lin Yu1, Ted Brown1
1Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Australian occupational therapy journal
|May 4, 2024
概括
感官处理测量2 (SPM2) 和感官配置文件2 (SP2) 在神经类型儿童中显示了趋同的有效性. 这些感官处理尺度可用于评估7-12岁儿童.
科学领域:
- 职业疗法 职业疗法 职业疗法
- 儿童心理学 儿童心理学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
背景情况:
- 感官处理措施2 (SPM2) 和感官配置文件2 (SP2) 被职业治疗师广泛用于评估儿童的感官处理.
- 这两种仪器旨在评估儿童感官处理能力的各个方面.
- 这项研究专门研究了SPM2-Home Form (SPM2-HF) 和儿童SP2在学龄,神经类型儿童中的融合有效性.
研究的目的:
- 为了检查SPM2-家庭表格 (SPM2-HF) 和儿童感官资料2 (SP2) 之间的合有效性.
- 为了确定这两个感官处理尺度是否为神经典型的学龄儿童提供了可比的结果.
主要方法:
- 一项涉及30名神经类型儿童的父母/照顾者的横截面研究,年龄在7至12岁之间.
- 参与者填写了SPM2-Home表格 (SPM2-HF) 和儿童SP2.
- 斯皮尔曼的rho相关系数与引导被用来分析子级分数之间的关系.
主要成果:
- 在儿童SP2和SPM2-HF的各种子尺度之间观察到具有统计意义的相关性.
- 在这两种仪器的感觉子尺度之间发现了强大到中等的相关性 (0.400.74).
- 象限子尺度的相关性从弱 (0.38) 到强 (0.77) 之间,表明一致的模式.
结论:
- 这些发现提供了证据,支持SPM2-家庭表格 (SPM2-HF) 和儿童SP2的融合有效性.
- 这些结果表明,这两种尺度可以互换地用于评估神经典型的学龄儿童的感官处理.
- 建议对SPM2-HF和儿童SP2的心理特征进行进一步的研究.
相关概念视频
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
342
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
342


