在防守:身份,语言和党派对政治丑闻的反应
Pierce D Ekstrom1, Marti Hope Gonzales2, Allison L Williams3
1University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.
Personality & social psychology bulletin
|May 6, 2024
概括
政党支持者更愿意原谅党内政客,他们否认或证明不当行为是正当的,而不是道歉. 这种偏见保护了党的形象,并表明了对党的目标的承诺,特别是当不当行为有利于党时.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 政治心理学 政治心理学
- 集团动力学 集团动力学
背景情况:
- 群体内偏见会影响政治判断.
- 社会认同和现实的群体冲突理论解释了群体间的行为.
- 对政治丑闻的党派反应是复杂的,并受到团体归属的影响.
研究的目的:
- 调查政治归属如何影响涉及丑闻的政治家的判断.
- 为了测试党员是否比那些道歉的人更能宽恕党内政客,他们否认或证明不当行为是合理的.
- 探索这些宽恕反应被放大的条件.
主要方法:
- 为了检查参与者对假设的政治丑闻的反应,进行了三项实验.
- 测量了参与者对政治家解释的反应 (否认,证明,道歉,沉默).
- 该研究操纵了不当行为对政治家政党和政治家地位的感知好处.
主要成果:
- 与那些保持沉默的人相比,与会者对否认或证明不当行为的党内政客做出了更积极的反应.
- 道歉并没有引起负面反应,但效果不如否认或理由.
- 否认/理由的有效性取决于不当行为有利于党或拥有高地位/关键席位的政治家.
结论:
- 党派对政治不当行为的宽恕受到战略考虑的影响,例如捍卫党的形象和目标.
- 否认和证明是党内政客减轻负面判断的有效策略.
- 跨群体的政治背景可能会导致个人接受对不当行为的解释,否则可能被视为冒犯.
相关概念视频
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K


