基于加速度计的久坐时间和从童年到年轻成年期的身体活动,随着心脏变化的进展:一项为期13年的纵向研究
1Clinical Epidemiology and Child Health Unit, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 8, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
European journal of preventive cardiology
|May 7, 2024
概括
儿童的静坐时间 (ST) 与心脏质量增加有关,而光强度体力活动 (LPA) 可能会改善心脏健康. 中度至强度的体力活动 (MVPA) 也随着时间的推移增加了心脏质量.
科学领域:
- 心脏病学 心脏病学
- 儿科 儿科 儿科
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 关于儿童身体活动和心脏变化的纵向数据有限.
- 年轻人久坐时间 (ST) 可能会影响长期的心血管健康.
- 了解这些关系对于早期干预至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查静坐时间 (ST),光强度体力活动 (LPA) 和中度至强度体力活动 (MVPA) 与心脏结构和功能变化之间的关联.
- 检查从童年到青春期的累积体育活动模式如何影响心脏.
- 为促进年轻人群体健康的心脏发育提供证据.
主要方法:
- 对阿文长度研究的父母和儿童 (ALSPAC) 队列的二次分析.
- 包括1682名儿童与加速仪测量身体活动和心声回声计测量心脏数据超过13年.
- 评估左心室质量以身高为指数 (LVMI2.7) 和左心室扩张功能 (LVDF).
主要成果:
- 增加的ST与逐渐增加的LVMI2.7 (0.002g/m2.7每分钟/天) 相关.
- 增加的LPA与减少的LVMI2.7 (-0.005g/m2.7每分钟/天) 和改善的LVDF相关.
- 增加的MVPA与增加的LVMI2.7 (0.003g/m2.7每分钟/天) 相关.
结论:
- ST显著增加了心脏质量,而LPA显示出保护作用.
- LPA减少了-49%的心脏质量,而ST对心脏质量变化贡献了+40%和MVPA+5%.
- 促进LPA可能对年轻人的心脏健康有益,而高ST可能会产生有害的长期影响.
相关概念视频
Longitudinal Studies
157
Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
157
Longitudinal Research
12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K


