使用间接措施评估性犯罪中的隐含理论:可行性,可靠性和增量有效性
Mirthe G C Noteborn1, Jelle J Sijtsema1,2, Jaap J A Denissen3
1Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Assessment
|May 8, 2024
概括
对性犯罪隐含理论 (IT) 的间接测量,包括IAT,IRAP和RRT,显示出不良的心理测量质量. 这些方法目前不推用于ITs的临床评估.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 法医心理学 法医心理学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
背景情况:
- 性犯罪的隐性理论 (IT) 是复杂的,难以衡量.
- 现有的间接措施,如IAT,IRAP和RRT在这种情况下并没有严格评估其心理特征.
研究的目的:
- 评估性犯罪隐含理论 (ITs) 的间接措施的心理测量质量.
- 为了比较IAT,IRAP和RRT的可行性,可靠性和有效性.
- 为了确定间接措施是否比自我报告措施提供增量预测有效性.
主要方法:
- 来自普通人口的109名男性样本参与了调查.
- 对IAT,IRAP和RRT进行了评估,包括可行性,内部一致性,收/区分有效性和预测有效性在内的心理测量质量.
- 攻击性行为也被评估用于比较.
主要成果:
- 没有任何间接措施满足了评估ITs的所有心理测量标准.
- IAT显示了侵略的可行性,但不是ITs. 对于IT来说,RRT有一定的可行性和可靠性.
- 该IRAP的可行性有限,可靠性低,复杂性高.
结论:
- 目前的间接措施 (IAT,IRAP,RRT) 在评估性犯罪隐性理论方面存在重大局限性.
- 这些措施缺乏足够的心理测量支持,无法在临床实践中可靠和有效地使用.
- 需要进一步的研究来开发和验证IT的强有力的间接措施.
更多相关视频
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
3.9K
09:49Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
14.1K
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
340
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
340
The Scientific Method
59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
94
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
94
Measures of Intelligence
7.2K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.2K
