Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Value incoherence precedes value change: Evidence from value development in childhood and adolescence across cultures.

European journal of personality·2026
Same author

A Meta-Analysis of Social and Contextual Correlates of Migrant Adaptation to Living in Receiving Societies.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Decoding Prejudice: Understanding Patterns of Adolescent Mental Health Stigma.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

WeARTolerance: Evaluating the impact of an arts-based program to reduce mental health-related stigma in young people.

PloS one·2024
Same author

The International Climate Psychology Collaboration: Climate change-related data collected from 63 countries.

Scientific data·2024
Same author

Loneliness trajectories over three decades are associated with conspiracist worldviews in midlife.

Nature communications·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.6K

数字集团间联系可以减少偏见吗? 一个元分析.

Leonor Pereira da Costa1, Kinga Bierwiaczonek2,3, Mauro Bianchi4

  • 1HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal.

Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking
|May 9, 2024
PubMed
概括

数字化群体间接触,就像在线互动一样,可以减少社会群体之间的偏见. 这项对88项研究的元分析发现,数字接触对减少偏见有微小但显著的影响.

关键词:
通过计算机介导的通信.这是一个体现形式.接触到不可玩的角色.集团间联系方式这是一个元分析.

更多相关视频

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

694
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.8K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

694
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.8K

科学领域:

  • 社会心理学 社会心理学
  • 沟通研究 沟通研究
  • 人与计算机的交互

背景情况:

  • 现代技术促进了不同社会群体之间频繁的数字互动.
  • 数字集团间联系对偏见 (减少或恶化) 的影响需要彻底调查.

研究的目的:

  • 对数字集团间接触和偏见之间关系的现有证据进行元分析.
  • 为了确定数字接触是否减少或增加各种跨群体背景的偏见.

主要方法:

  • 对88个独立样本进行了元分析,包括实验和相关性研究.
  • 来自9,385名参与者的数据被汇总起来,以评估整体效应的大小.
  • 研究了不同形式的数字联系 (直接与间接,沟通方法).

主要成果:

  • 数字集团间联系在减少偏见方面表现出小但统计学上显著的效果 (g = 0.25).
  • 与间接接触相比,直接的数字联系产生了更强大的偏见减少效应.
  • 计算机介导的沟通显示出比通过非可玩角色或实施例的接触更有效.
  • 这些积极影响在偏见的不同外部群体中是一致的.

结论:

  • 数字集团间联系,特别是直接和计算机介导的形式,显示了减少集团间偏见的潜力.
  • 调查结果表明,利用技术进行集团间互动可以成为减轻偏见的可行策略.