今天的积极影响预测明天有意义的巧合的经验:一个交叉滞后的多层次分析
Christian Rominger1, Andreas Fink1, Corinna M Perchtold-Stefan1
1Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Cognition & emotion
|May 9, 2024
概括
正面影响,而不是负面影响,预测有意义的巧合. 这表明灵活的思维方式,而不是应对机制,有助于体验有意义的巧合.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 认知科学 认知科学
背景情况:
- 经历有意义的巧合,也被称为同步性或apophenia,是常见的,但它的预测因素是未知的.
- 存在两个主要假设:有意义的巧合来自于灵活的思维方式 (与积极的情感相关) 或作为对抗负面情绪的机制.
研究的目的:
- 调查正面影响 (PA) 或负面影响 (NA) 是否预测第二天有意义的巧合的发生.
- 要区分灵活的思维方式假设和应对机制假设.
主要方法:
- 从两项日常日记研究 (N=169) 的综合数据集重新分析.
- 使用跨滞多层建模方法与贝叶斯估计.
- 检查了日常影响 (PA,NA) 和日常有意义的巧合之间的预测关系.
主要成果:
- 积极影响 (PA) 显著预测了第二天有意义的巧合的数量.
- 没有发现负面影响 (NA) 对有意义的巧合有重大影响.
- 这些发现支持灵活的思维方式假设.
结论:
- 积极的影响促进了对有意义的巧合的感知,支持灵活的思维风格理论.
- 有意义的巧合的经历似乎不是一种应对负面情绪的策略.
- 未来的研究可以探索连接积极影响和模式感知的认知机制.
更多相关视频
08:27Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
6.9K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
694
相关概念视频
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Correlations
32.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
32.8K
Correlation and Causation
37.6K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.6K
Correlation
11.7K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
11.7K
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing
70
Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to an individual's self-evaluation of their overall life satisfaction, happiness, and fulfillment. This multifaceted construct is typically assessed by analyzing the balance of positive and negative emotions alongside perceptions of life satisfaction. Personality traits such as neuroticism and extraversion are strongly associated with variations in SWB, offering critical insights into the underlying mechanisms of emotional well-being.
Neuroticism and...
Neuroticism and...
70
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
