评估社区层面的干预措施,以解决青少年暴力根源的挑战
Krista R Mehari1, Phillip N Smith2, Benterah C Morton2
1Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. krista.mehari@vanderbilt.edu.
概括
本研究提出了多重基线设计,以评估社区青年暴力预防策略. 这种严格而又实用的方法解决了健康差异,而不会拒绝任何社区的干预.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 健康差距 研究 研究 研究 研究
- 基于社区的干预措施
背景情况:
- 暴力不成比例地影响美国黑人青年,突出显著的健康差异.
- 结构性不平等是青年暴力的潜在根源,需要有效的预防策略.
- 评估社区层面的干预措施在设计,采样和测量方面存在方法上的挑战.
研究的目的:
- 为社区层面的青年暴力和自杀预防战略提出和评估一个多重基线实验设计.
- 在干预评估中平衡科学严谨性与实际和基于价值的考虑.
- 通过解决方法和伙伴关系需求,为未来的健康差异干预研究提供信息.
主要方法:
- 提出了一个多个社区单位的多个基线实验设计.
- 该设计包含随机化和可信的反事实.
- 测量策略由逻辑模型,变化机制和健康差异结果提供信息.
主要成果:
- 多重基线设计提供了一种严格而又实用的方法来评估社区级干预措施.
- 它允许通过足够的功率和适当的测量策略来检测变化.
- 这种设计避免了大样本的要求,并确保所有社区都能接受干预.
结论:
- 多重基线设计适用于评估复杂的社区级健康差异干预措施.
- 未来的研究需要共同的公共卫生紧迫感,以价值观为基础的决策和社区与学术伙伴关系.
- 通过clinicaltrials.gov注册,确保研究的透明度和严格性.
相关概念视频
Community Based Intervention
41
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
41
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
93
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
93
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Conduct Disorder
31
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
31
Bullying
8.4K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
251
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
251


