自行车旅行路线选择的数字安全性:对于通勤者来说,一种选择实验方法
Rashmeet Kaur Khanuja1, Geetam Tiwari2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India.
Accident; analysis and prevention
|May 12, 2024
概括
数量安全效应通常会增加骑自行车者的安全感,鼓励更多骑自行车的人选择路线. 然而,过度的自行车流量可能会导致拥挤,降低感知安全,并阻止骑手,特别是有良好的基础设施.
科学领域:
- 运输科学 运输科学
- 城市规划 城市规划
- 行为心理学 行为心理学
背景情况:
- 数量安全 (SiN) 现象表明,道路使用者的增加减少了个人碰撞的风险.
- 虽然SiN是为了客观安全而建立的,但它对感知安全的影响,特别是对骑自行车的人来说,不太了解.
- 感知到的安全性显著影响骑自行车者的路线选择和整体模式共享.
研究的目的:
- 调查数字安全对骑自行车者的安全感的影响.
- 分析安全感知如何影响骑自行车者的路线选择行为.
- 确定影响骑自行车路线偏好的关键因素.
主要方法:
- 在印度德里南部进行了一项声明偏好调查.
- 研究速度限制,机动交通量,自行车基础设施和自行车交通密度对路线选择的影响.
- 采用二进制逻辑模型来量化对路线选择的属性影响.
主要成果:
- 骑自行车的人通常更喜欢骑自行车流量较高的路线,支持"人数安全"效应.
- 这种效应并不普遍;高自行车流量可以被认为是拥挤,威骑手,特别是在有专门基础设施的路线上.
- 低机动交通量和专门的自行车基础设施始终是骑手的首选.
结论:
- 促进基础设施发展的政策,例如提供横向隔离的专用自行车道,至关重要.
- 改善的基础设施可以提高人们对安全的感知,鼓励更多的骑自行车者,并增加总体自行车模式的份额.
- 了解客观SiN之外的感知安全的细微差别,对于有效的城市交通规划至关重要.
相关概念视频
01:41Social Traps
22.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.3K
01:08Determination of Expected Frequency
2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
02:01Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
01:21Introduction to Test of Independence
2.2K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.2K
01:12What is an Experiment?
11.4K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
11.4K
01:52Persuasion Strategies
38.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K