压力下集中和抑制的刺性过程:一项关于挪威精英两项运动员的步枪射击研究
Khelifa Bartura1, Frank Eirik Abrahamsen1,2, Henrik Gustafsson1,3
1Department of Sport and Social Sciences, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, NIH, Oslo, Norway.
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
|May 13, 2024
概括
在步枪射击中抑制不必要的想法可能会使性能恶化. 运动员可以通过在认知负载下管理重复的注意力和消极思想来减少刺错误.
科学领域:
- 运动心理学 运动心理学
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 表演心理学 表演心理学
背景情况:
- 压制不必要的想法可以悖论地损害运动中的表现,如步枪射击.
- 了解注意力和负面线索的影响对于优化运动员在压力下的表现至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了研究如何启动注意力和负面线索影响射击性能.
- 使用Stroop任务在不同的认知负载条件下检查这些效应.
- 确定减轻两项运动员刺性表现错误的策略.
主要方法:
- 在半精英两项运动员中采用了主题内准实验设计.
- 参与者在低和高认知负载下执行了基于反向Stroop的目标射击任务.
- 用重复测量和差异分析来评估命中率和响应时间.
主要成果:
- 调节重复的原始化注意力思维有效地减少了刺性表现错误和干扰.
- 重复启动负面线索导致最小的刺错误,但在高认知负载下反应时间较慢.
- 贝叶斯分析支持负线索效应的零假设.
结论:
- 控制重复的注意力和负面思想减少了在认知负载下双项运动员的刺性表现错误.
- 思想抑制策略的有效性需要进一步研究,特别是对于压力下的任务相关的负面指令.
更多相关视频
05:26Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
6.7K
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
12.6K
相关概念视频
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Case Studies
11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
