现金奖励是否总是最重要的? 一个随机对照试验,评估快乐与现金激励 (TEH-C) 之间的对比
Eric Andrew Finkelstein1, Michelle Tian Nee Chow1, Mihir Gandhi2,3,4
1Health Services & Systems Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Frontiers in public health
|May 15, 2024
概括
现金和快乐的激励有效地促进身体活动 (PA),鼓励个人达到每天的步骤目标. 然而,在这项为期四个月的研究中,两种激励策略都没有表现出优于对方的优势.
科学领域:
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 运动科学 运动科学
背景情况:
- 身体不活动是肥胖和非传染性疾病的主要危险因素.
- 尽管有众多的健康益处,但大多数人不符合体力活动 (PA) 建议.
- 激励措施可能会增加PA水平,关于现金或享乐奖励是否更有效的辩论.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较现金与享乐激励的有效性,在多个时间段内促进身体活动.
- 为了确定一个激励策略是否优于持续的PA目标实现.
主要方法:
- 一个为期4个月的随机对照试验,涉及新加坡的健康成年人.
- 参与者被分配到现金激励臂或享乐激励臂.
- 每个月至少在20天内达到每日步骤目标 (10,000步) 提供了激励.
主要成果:
- 现金和享乐激励组都显示了平均每日步骤的显著增加.
- 在两组中,达到步骤目标的月份比例都很高 (90.53%为现金, 88.34%为享乐).
- 对于任何结果,现金和享乐激励臂之间没有发现统计学上显著的差异.
结论:
- 现金和快乐的激励措施都能有效地促进身体活动.
- 在本研究中,这两种激励策略都没有显示出对另一种激励策略的明显优势.
- 进一步的研究可能会探索长期影响和个人对激励措施的偏好.
相关概念视频
Randomized Experiments
6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
430
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
The theory differentiates between...
430
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Blinding
2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Blind Procedures
10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Crossover Experiments
2.8K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.8K


