检查设计可比效果大小对特殊教育中单个案例设计分析的影响
Seth A King1, Brendon Nylen2, Olivia Enders3
1Department of Teaching and Learning, University of Iowa.
School psychology (Washington, D.C.)
|May 16, 2024
概括
许多使用单个案例设计的特殊教育研究不符合效果大小分析的What Works Clearinghouse标准. 这影响了对有发展障碍的学生证据的解释.
科学领域:
- 教育研究方法的教育研究方法.
- 特殊教育 特殊教育
- 应用行为分析应用行为分析.
背景情况:
- 单一案例设计在特殊教育研究中越来越受欢迎.
- 从视觉分析转向效果大小,与组设计相提并论.
- 什么工作清算中心 (WWC) 使用设计可比的效果大小,影响证据解释.
研究的目的:
- 评估特殊教育期刊中单个案例设计研究与WWC假设的兼容性.
- 确定符合WWC标准的研究比例,以计算效果大小.
主要方法:
- 来自33个特殊教育期刊 (1999-2021) 的1,425个单一案例设计文章的随机样本被审查.
- 研究与设计,参与者数量和治疗复制的WWC假设进行了评估.
主要成果:
- 近60% (59.88%) 的选择单一案例设计研究没有满足WWC的假设.
- 专注于发展障碍学生的期刊的拒绝率最高.
- 与设计,参与者数和复制相关的兼容性问题.
结论:
- 在特殊教育中,很大一部分单个案例设计研究可能不符合像WWC这样的实体所使用的当前效果大小计算标准.
- 这对已建立的证据基础有影响,特别是针对发展障碍学生的干预措施.
- 单个案例设计可能需要进一步的方法改进,以与当代证据标准保持一致.
相关概念视频
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
129
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
129
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
1.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.6K
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K


